Topics
- Auto Finance
- CFPB
- CFPB Enforcement Actions
- CFPB Rulemaking
- Class Actions
- Credit Cards
- Credit Reporting
- Debt Collection
- Dodd-Frank
- ECOA
- Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
- Fair Lending
- Fannie Mae
- FDIC
- Federal Housing Administration
- Foreclosures
- Freddie Mac
- HOEPA
- Insurance Coverage
- MERS
- Mortgage Servicing
- Mortgages
- Office of Comptroller of Currency
- Pay Day Lending
- Preemption
- Privacy
- Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
- Reverse Mortgages
- State Consumer Protection Laws
- Student Loans
- Truth In Lending Act
- Uniform Commercial Code
Recent Updates
- Senate Vote on Cordray Nomination Expected Next Week: Anyone Holding Their Breath?
- Get Out the Popcorn (and an Energy Drink): The CFPB Releases Videos On New Mortgage Rules
- CFPB Proposes Delay in Implementing Rule Against Financing of Certain Credit Insurance on Mortgage Loans
- Just-Issued Final Remittance Rule Suggests CFPB is Listening… Sort Of
- FHFA Limits Fannie and Freddie to “Qualified Loans”: Another Strike Against Non-Qualified Loans and the Consumers Who Rely on Them
- CFPB Publishes Small Entity Compliance Guides for New HOEPA, ECOA, and TILA Rules- Institutions of All Sizes Should Take Notice
- CFPB Probes Auto Lenders Over Extended Warranty And Other Ancillary Products
- CFPB Hosting Student Loan Hearing: New Rules On The Way???
- Legislation Seeks to Limit CFPB’s Authority Over Community Banks, Credit Unions and Small Servicers
- CFPB Eases Limits On Credit Card Fees to Avoid Court Battle: Afraid of the Fight or Evidence that It Is Listening Industry Stakeholders?
Editors
Contributors
CFPB Launches Public Inquiry Into Arbitration Clauses
The CFPB took its first step to fulfilling its mandate under section
1028(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act to study arbitration clauses by issuing
today a Notice and Request for Information to help identify the
appropriate scope of its study, as well as the appropriate methods and
sources of data for conducting the study. Specifically, the Bureau has
requested suggestions from the public and has listed a series of
questions to determine how, among other issues, it should determine the
prevalence of the use of such clauses in various markets and the
prevalence of particular terms, as well as what data it should seek and
from whom. The Bureau is also looking into whether it should study
changes in the language of arbitration clauses over time, and whether it
should analyze the types of claims brought under arbitration, and the
cost and speed of arbitration proceedings, as well as the outcomes.
While the Bureau has the authority to regulate arbitration clauses,
including an outright prohibition, it is not requesting comment on
whether and how it should exercise its rulemaking authority at this
time. The purpose of the request and the submitted comments is merely to
assist the Bureau in structuring its study. Comments are due on or
before June 23, 2012.

